Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is ...

Income Tax

August 28, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is no mentioning of reasons by the A.O. in the assessment order as to why the Notice has to be served through affixture and the A.O. has not mentioned anything regarding efforts of ‘due and reasonable diligence to serve the notice’ on the assessee as required under rule 17 of order V of the CPC, thus the Service of Notice by way of affixture on the Assessee cannot be construed as sufficient Service of Notice. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is ...

Income Tax

August 28, 2023

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance to notice 142(1) - It is evident that date of service of the statutory notice in question issued u/s 142(1), has not been...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The notice does not delete the appropriate words and in the assessment order as well as in the penalty order, both...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - protective assessment - there can be a protective order qua assessment, there cannot be a protective order in respect of penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the section has been enacted to provide for a remedy for loss of revenue, by reason of concealment of particulars of income - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b)- assessee refused to answer the notice u/s 142(1) - assessee was an attorney of some account holder - levy of penalty confimred - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Quick Updates: