Jurisdiction power u/s 263 by CIT(A) - CIT was not justified in ...

Income Tax

March 19, 2013

Jurisdiction power u/s 263 by CIT(A) - CIT was not justified in not allowing the unabsorbed depreciation against income from capital gains to the extent of admissibility to Rs.66.67 % - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction power u/s 263 by CIT(A) - CIT was not justified in ...

Income Tax

March 19, 2013

You may also like:

Unabsorbed depreciation - whether unabsorbed depreciation should be allowed before the allowance of the unabsorbed investment allowance - This scrambled egg cannot be...

After allowing depreciation, unabsorbed loss and unabsorbed depreciation, there was no positive income - the assessee was not entitled to any deduction u/s 80HH & 80I of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unabsorbed Depreciation or unabsorbed Business Loss - Even, assuming for a moment, the PCIT is right on his observation, but fact remains that...

Carry forward of investment allowance - unabsorbed depreciation of Amalgamating Company - Section 72A - Claim allowed - HC

Disallowance on account of setting of STCG against depreciation - carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation - set off allowed.

Revised return of loss/unabsorbed depreciation – even if the assessee has not filed revised return, AO is bound to allow carried forward loss or depreciation as per the record - AT

MAT computation u/s 115JB - unabsorbed depreciation adjustment - the brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation as per the books and as per the provisions of...

Deduction u/s 10B - profit of eligible undertaking for the purpose of allowing deduction u/s 10B of the Act at the source itself without deduction of unabsorbed brought...

Setting off the brought forward unabsorbed depreciation against the Income from House Property - effect must be given to Section 32(2) of the Act for that assessment...

Claim of deduction u/s 10A of the IT Act,, without setting off of brought forward losses/unabsorbed depreciation allowed - AT

Quick Updates: