Unreasonable delay in completion of reassessment - It is thus ...

VAT and Sales Tax

September 15, 2023

Unreasonable delay in completion of reassessment - It is thus clear that even if the notice was issued within the prescribed period of limitation, inordinate/unreasonable delay in completing the proceedings would vitiate the same. In the present case, there is no explanation as to why it has taken more than six years after the issuance of the first notice on 23.07.2014 to issue the second notice on 23.06.2020 while proceeding to pass the impugned order on 05.02.2021 after almost 10 years from the deemed assessment - Demand and order set aside - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unreasonable delay in completion of reassessment - It is thus ...

VAT and Sales Tax

September 15, 2023

You may also like:

Validity of adjudication of SCN after much delay - grant of centralized service tax registration - even after the Petitioner informed of the same on 8 May 2013, without...

Inordinate delay in adjudication of SCN - Clandestine Removal - Adjudication of such a show cause notice after 29 years would be contrary to the mandate of Section...

Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

Demand of differential tax - The present show cause notices are reassessment of reassessment for the same period - Such authority is not available to Revenue.

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Time limit for notice - there is no document made available to prove that the notice under section 148 dated 31.03.2018 was sent for...

Best judgment Assessment u/s 144 read with section 147 - non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Once the language of the statute is plain, simple, clear and unambiguous,...

Jurisdiction to issue Notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act - Issuance of Notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment on the basis of ‘Borrowed satisfaction’ -...

Reassessment u/s 147 without service of Notice u/s 143(2) - whether Notice under section 143(2) to be directory and not mandatory - held as mandatory - HC

Re-assessment proceedings - only a delay of 4 ½ months in supplying the reasons recorded by the AO to the petitioner cannot invalidate the reassessment proceedings - HC

Penalty levied u/s. 271B - Defective notice - vague and unspecific notice - failure to furnish the audit report u/s 44AB before the due date - Notice proposing penalty...

Quick Updates: