Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2023

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application - Petitioner has not filed the revised returns u/s 139(5) of the Act but he has admitted to an inadvertent error in declaring total income as Nil vide a rectification application. Admittedly, he is entitled to a refund of Rs. 72,370/- for excess amount of tax deduction at source. - CIT directed to accept the rectified ITR and process the same in accordance with law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2023

You may also like:

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Rejection application for Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Rejection on the ground the assessee has filing an appeal u/s 246 which was rejected by the CIT(A) due...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not waived his appellate right - delay of 2 years, 10 months and 8 days can not be condoned - HC

Reasonable cause for the delay in filing the revision application before the CIT under Section 264 - HC

Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application on the ground that, the assessee has filed application only against the order of assessment -...

Right to file an appeal before CIT(A) where the application for revision u/s 264 rejected by the CIT - Notwithstanding unsuccessful effort of the assessee in the...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory...

Quick Updates: