Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2023 Year 2023 This

Revision u/s 263 - The fact that the vouchers were not found in ...

Income Tax

October 3, 2023

Revision u/s 263 - The fact that the vouchers were not found in the premises of the appellant trust at the time of survey proceedings, should have triggered the AO to enquire and verify the evidence of the expenditure incurred on those items such as “Bonus, Perks and Allowances, Office Expenses, Tours and Travelling Expenses, Building Repairs Expenses etc”, which the AO had failed to do so. Therefore, this fact clearly demonstrates that the AO had failed to conduct necessary enquiries - Revision order sustained - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - undisclosed income accepted / acknowledged by the assessee during the course of survey proceedings - There is a marked difference between “money/...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

  3. Revision u/s 263 - at the time of exercise of jurisdiction under Section 263, admittedly, proceedings before AAR was pending on the issue of taxability of receipts from...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

  5. Assessment u/s 153A – Invocation of power of revision u/s 263 - Commissioner did not have jurisdiction to initiate any proceedings u/s 263 - HC

  6. Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - No doubt, these transactions were not recorded at the time of survey thus qualify as unrecorded transactions satisfying one of the essential...

  8. Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

  9. Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

  10. Application for stay of Revision proceedings u/s 263 - stay should not be granted in this case and the same stands dismissed. - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates