Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was ...

Central Excise

November 1, 2023

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS Scheme and there is no cause for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the director of the company who has been a paid employee - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was ...

Central Excise

November 1, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Levy of penalty on Director, managing director and general manager u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - There are no merits in the impugned order imposing...

Levy of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit - There are no whisper about any retraction or any disputes...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Quick Updates: