While issuing Draft order u/s 144C, AO issued demand notice with ...

Income Tax

November 6, 2023

While issuing Draft order u/s 144C, AO issued demand notice with penalty notice - If particular income is taxable under the I.T. Act, it cannot be taxed on the basis of estoppel or any other equal document. Equity is out of placed in tax place. A particular income is either exigible under the Income tax under taxing statute or not. If it is not, the ITO Has no power to tax the said income. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

While issuing Draft order u/s 144C, AO issued demand notice with ...

Income Tax

November 6, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - AO has miserably failed to specify in the notice issued under section 274 read with...

Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defects in the notice issued u/s 274 - CIT(A) reduced the penalty to 10% applying provisions of Section 271AAB(a) of the Act as against penalty...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

Assessment u/s 144C - AO issued notice of demand at stage of draft assessment order - without following the procedure as contemplated u/s. 144C of the Act the AO issued...

Reopening of assessment - AO was not aware about the death of the assessee at the relevant time when he issued notice under section 148 of the Act. Therefore, notice...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - valid approval u/s 151 - “unsigned approval” issued in electronic form - The point of time when the AO issued notices u/s 148, he was...

Validity of assessment - Though the Income Tax Act does not anywhere contemplate issuance of a show cause notice prior to finalisation of scrutiny assessments, as a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - notice issued but not served - Simply penalty has been imposed by considering that the notices were issued. In our view, service of notice is...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - validity of show cause notice issued - The ITAT emphasized the legal necessity for the AO to clearly specify the nature of the default—whether...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - ITAT observed that the notice issued by the AO would be bad in law if it did not specify which limb of Section 271(1) (c) the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(C) - defective notice - neither the assessee nor anyone else could make out as to whether the notice u/s. 274 r. w. S. 271 of the Act was issued for...

Quick Updates: