Demanding duty from the firm and penalties were imposed on the ...

Central Excise

April 8, 2013

Demanding duty from the firm and penalties were imposed on the firm & partner both - The appeal filed by the firm cannot be considered as joint appeal - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demanding duty from the firm and penalties were imposed on the ...

Central Excise

April 8, 2013

You may also like:

Demand – personal penalty – penalty is sought to be imposed not only on the firm but also on the partners which is clearly not permissible- AT

Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

Imposition of Simultaneous Penalties - Whether CESTAT erred in imposing simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm – Matter referred to larger bench - HC

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Revenue cannot go beyond to the duties demanded and penalties imposed in the order, if it has not filed any appeal against order in original - AT

Penalty u/s 271C – reasonable cause - The assessees are partners in a firm – Both the assessees has paid interest to firm without deducting tax at source - No penalty - AT

Demand in respect of firm raised in the name of Partner - In the light of the legal nature of a partnership firm, a demand raised on the managing partner can never be...

Imposition of penalties on partners of manufacturing firm u/r 26 of CER - non-payment of Central Excise duty by the partnership firm, M/s Allied Electricals - It is not...

Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Clandestine removal - Once the penalty was imposed on a partnership firm, no separate penalty should be imposed on the partners separately for...

Demand of service tax on partners services to partnership firm - separate identity - mutuality of services - there cannot be a service provider – service recipient...

Quick Updates: