Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of ...

Income Tax

February 7, 2024

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of section 269SS & 269T - Reliance on search proceeding documents - Transactions being mere book entries - Following the judgement of Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that, the expression “money” means currency/cash. Therefore, very essential ingredient to constitute a default within the meaning of 269SS or 269T is that whether there is movement of money. Mere book entries alone, during the course of training, cannot entail a default of taking or repaying the loan in cash, unless it is established that Moneys moved from one person to another person, which is in the nature of loans or deposits” - CIT(A) rightly deleted the penalties.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of ...

Income Tax

February 7, 2024

You may also like:

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Penalty imposed u/s 271D & 271E - default u/s 269SS & 269T - CIT(A) deleted the penalty holding that general entries leading to assignment of debt does not attract...

Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - loans in question were received by the assessee in cash from her daughter and son-in-law - no penalty leviable

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of...

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - penalty confirmed - HC

Violate the provisions of section 269SS and 269T – share application money - penalty u/s 271D and 271E is not automatic - if there is bonafide belief, no penalty u/s...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of Section 269SS ranged from just 1.1% to 6.14% for the years under appeal - no penalty - HC

Quick Updates: