Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The ...

GST

February 9, 2024

Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The High Court noted that, apart from the factual aspect that the Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up, there is no material on record to show that the petitioner had any mens rea to evade tax. It is to be noted that the invoice, that was being carried, matched with the goods in the truck and the goods were not in variance with the invoice. - The HC held that, the reason of presumption of evasion of tax is without any basis in law, and accordingly, the order of detention and subsequent appellate order are illegal and required to be set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The ...

GST

February 9, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

Levy of penalty for discrepancy in E-way Bill - E-way bills generated without completely filling Part B - The object of circular dated 14.09.2018 was that in case of...

Demand of tax alongwith penalty - part B of the e-way bill accompanying with the goods, was not filled - The petitioner has not submitted any explanation up to the stage...

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Levy of personal penalty - The foundation aspect of the case proceeded by the department against the company as well as the petitioner is no more inexistence. The...

Refund of amount with interest from the date of levy till final payment at the rate of 15% per annum - petitioners did not challenge the assessment order under three...

GST e-way bill-01 - non furnishing of the details of conveyance in 'Part B' of GST e-way bill-01 - once the Government itself has clarified the situation by allowing the...

Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - E-Way bill stood expired - - This Court already held that there is no lack of bona fide on the part of the writ petitioner in the...

Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill was not filled up - The High court observed that the department failed to prove any intention on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Levy of penalty - Compliance of E-Way bill as required under the provisions of the CGST/UPGST Act and related rule or not - presumption of tax evasion in its absence -...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b) and u/s 114AA of CA - Penalty on logistic service provider - There cannot be ulterior motive on their part to have filed the IGM and the...

Levy of maximum penalty - penalty imposed on the basis of technical error - non downloading of E-way Bill-01 - The Allahabad High Court reviewed the matter and set aside...

Quick Updates: