Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective ...

Income Tax

February 27, 2024

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind properly while initiating the penalty proceedings - The Tribunal rules in favor of the appellant, stating that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of clarity in the penalty charge. - As a result, the penalty is deleted for all assessment years under consideration.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - ITAT rightly set-aside the order of the penalty levied on the Assessee.

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for such notices to clearly delineate the charge against the assessee, allowing...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of clear charge - the Tribunal held that that the penalty imposed by the A.O is not valid due to the...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 271AAA - concealed income on account of excess claim of depreciation - A.O has merely mentioned one line imported from section 271(1)(c) of the Act...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates