Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and ...

GST

February 27, 2024

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 returns, indirect income, and payment of rent for commercial purposes. - The High court quashes the assessment order in part (related to Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11) and remands the matter for re-consideration. A fresh show cause notice is allowed for Discrepancy No. 2.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and ...

GST

February 27, 2024

You may also like:

GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods...

Validity of reassessment of order - When the discrepancies are there, it will have to be clarified by the assessee - the notices were rightly issued u/s 148 of the Act - HC

Rectification petition - Validity Of Order passed - discrepancy between the GSTR 3B return - The petitioner contended that the discrepancy arose due to the belated...

Validity of demand of GST - For assessment year 2017-2018 - Notice in Form ASMT-10 issued for discrepancies found in returns - proceedings initiated pursuant to notice...

Validity of assessment order - alleged discrepancies in returns filed by the petitioner - The case involved a challenge to an assessment order by a petitioner in the...

Duty demand - Discrepancy in RG-1 Register - Shortage in goods - charges of clandestine activities are required to be upheld on the basis of sufficient cogent reasons...

Requirement of filing appeal on online mode or in any other way - Assessment Order copies were received manually - apparently there is a discrepancy between Rule 108(1)...

Validity of order in original and Demand of GST - These issues included discrepancies in GST returns, imposition of cess, treatment of scrips, and taxation of corporate...

Additions on account of difference between the purchase and cost of sales - AO did not point out any defect/discrepancy in books of account - no addition - AT

Demand of Service tax - discrepancy in the figures in the balance sheet and service returns - there was no suppression of fact on the part of the respondent - AT

Quick Updates: