Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - ...

Indian Laws

March 5, 2024

Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the subordinate court. The court ruled that the plaintiff had adequately proved the execution of the promissory note, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also rejected the defendants' arguments regarding non-impleading of a party and discrepancies in witness testimony.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - ...

Indian Laws

March 5, 2024

You may also like:

Dishonor of Promissory Notes - Suit for recovery of money, based on two promissory notes - rebuttal of presumption - No doubt, by proving the execution of the promissory...

The onus is upon the assessee to establish that the money was borrowed for the purpose of business - assessee failed to prove the onus - Claim of Interest disallowed - AT

Refund - unjust enrichment - burden to prove and to rebut - All the authorities have concurrently found that the assessee has failed to discharge that burden - no...

Recovery of suit amount on the basis of promissory note - Money Suit - legally enforceable debt or not - If the suit transaction falls within the scope of a debt relief...

Dishonor of cheque - suit promissory notes - fill up the blanks - There is no mandatory provision under the Negotiable Instruments Act that both the signature and thump...

Benami transactions - offence under Benami Act - onus of proving a benami transaction - after amendment, the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the...

Dishonor of Cheque - declared income was sufficient to prove loan or not - while in the criminal proceedings the complainant had failed to produce the promissory notes,...

Once the assessee has discharged the initial onus to prove that the deduction is allowable, the onus to prove that the deduction is not admissible, shifts to the tax...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Remittance from outside India - revenue v/s capital receipt - onus to prove - assessee could not discharge his onus and could not prove that the money has come out of...

Quick Updates: