Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Bogus capital introduced by the ...

Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal, Questions Credibility of Partners' Inflated Agricultural Income u/s 68.

March 9, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Bogus capital introduced by the partners of the assessee-firm - as per CIT(A) Agriculture income shown by the partners was highly inflated and actually there was not enough income to justify the capital introduction - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the addition should have been made in the hands of the partners if their creditworthiness was in question. The quantum of income returned by the partners was accepted by the Revenue under a different head, indicating their creditworthiness. - The Tribunal partly allows the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the addition of fresh capital and directing a reduction in the ad-hoc disallowance of expenses.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Bogus capital introduced by the ...

Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal, Questions Credibility of Partners' Inflated Agricultural Income u/s 68.

March 9, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of whether land sold should be treated as agricultural for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) purposes. The Department did not...

Exemption on agricultural income - firm is not the owner of such agricultural land but the partners - assessee firm though not being the owner of the agricultural land...

Agricultural income - When all the documents have been brought on record by the assessee during assessment proceedings but not examined by the AO assessee cannot put...

Undisclosed income of the assessee - bogus sale of agricultural produce - preponderance of probability theory - The Tribunal noted that the AO had not properly...

ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation...

The assessee sold agricultural land during the year which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as a capital asset, leading to levy of long-term capital gains tax. The...

Section 2(1-A) amended retrospectively to restrict agricultural land exemption to rural areas, introducing concept of "urban agricultural land" under "capital asset"...

Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined...

The ITAT Bangalore, in a case involving unexplained money u/s. 69A, addressed deposits in a bank account during the demonetisation period. The DR argued that the...

Income from undisclosed sources - addition of agricultural income - Assessment of agricultural income declared by the assessee for various assessment years was...

Income derived from agricultural activities is exempt u/s 10(1) of the Act. The assessee, a professional agricultural graduate, consistently declared agricultural income...

ITAT determined that income derived from mushroom cultivation qualifies as agricultural income exempt under section 10(1). Following precedent from Inventaa Industries,...

Cash deposit in bank account treated as unexplained income - Agricultural income or not? - The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's claims regarding...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - capital contribution in cash by the partners - While deleting the additions, the Tribunal held that, if the Ld. AO was not...

Receipt or accrual of any real income - Agricultural income - the tribunal has recorded the finding that the assessee was neither in possession of the agricultural land...

Quick Updates: