Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity assessment proceedings u/s 153C - recording of ...


One Satisfaction Note Suffices for Section 153C Proceedings, Even with Same Assessing Officer for All Parties.

March 15, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity assessment proceedings u/s 153C - recording of satisfaction - The ITAT examined the language of Section 153C and referenced the judgment in Ganpati Fincap Services P. Ltd & Ors v. Commissioner of Income Tax. It concluded that only one satisfaction note is required, even if the Assessing Officer of the searched person and the other person is the same. The satisfaction note must confirm that the seized documents belong to the other person, fulfilling the requirements of Section 153C. - It was clarified that the failure of the Assessing Officer of the searched person to make a note in the file of the searched person after transmitting documents to the Assessing Officer of the other person does not invalidate the proceedings under Section 153C.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of assessment framed u/s 153C - Search conducted at secret office of searched person - Definition of "Books and Books of Accounts" u/s 2(12A) includes...

  2. HC affirmed that recording a satisfaction note is mandatory before initiating proceedings under Section 153C, even when the Assessing Officer for both searched and other...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of assessments made u/s 153C, considering the gap between the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

  5. Validity of Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C - as argued satisfaction note of the searched person and satisfaction note of the petitioner (other than the searched...

  6. The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

  7. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

  8. Block assessment - satisfaction u/s 158BD - Mandatory requirement of satisfaction of Assessing officer is not required, when the assessing officer who initiated...

  9. The assessment u/s 153C mandates the recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer (AO) upon discovery of material likely to "have a bearing on the determination of...

  10. Validity of assessment u/s 153C - There is no prohibition in the Act that a combined satisfaction-note should not be recorded. Moreover, the satisfaction- note, is...

  11. Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D in rectification proceedings u/s 154 - Mandation of recording satisfaction - Recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer under Rule...

  12. Assessment u/s 153C - satisfaction on the basis of the borrowed information - It is true that the supreme Court has made the said observations while considering the...

  13. The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

  14. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates