Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that the ...

Income Tax

March 20, 2024

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that the exercise of the second revision jurisdiction by the PCIT on the same issue was not justified. It noted that the AO had made necessary inquiries as per the directions of the first PCIT and that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share subscribers.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

  2. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the assessee had duly explained as to why certain receipts though subjected to TDS, would not be liable to be offered to tax such as...

  3. Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain a baggage matter for which the appellant may choose to exercise its right of revision before the Revisionary Authority - AT

  4. Revision u/s 263 - successor PCIT / CIT did not agree with his predecessor - second revision order - assessment has been set aside or de novo assessment - sending of the...

  5. Doctrine of merger - Validity of Revision u/s 263 when existing pending appeal against order passed u/s 153C r.w.s. 144 - when larger issue was pending before CIT(A),...

  6. Revision u/s 263 - claim of TDS - In the absence of any demonstrable loss of revenue, interference in exercise of power u/s 263 cannot be justified - AT

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) - CIT is not justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 on the strength of an audit note - AT

  9. Assessment u/s 153A – Invocation of power of revision u/s 263 - Commissioner did not have jurisdiction to initiate any proceedings u/s 263 - HC

  10. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As both the issues in question on the basis of which the Pr.CIT had assumed jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act had been considered and decided in...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates