Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected ...

Income Tax

March 22, 2024

Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected as intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act is not an order amenable to revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - The court ruled that intimation under Section 143(1) is amenable to revisional jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Act. This was based on precedent in "Diwaker Tripathi v. Principal Commissioner of Income tax – 17 & Ors.", which allowed for such revision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected ...

Income Tax

March 22, 2024

You may also like:

Revision u/s 264 against intimation/order u/s 143(1) - an intimation passed u/s 143(1) is regarded as an ‘order’ for the purpose of Section 264 - hence revision petition...

Right to file an appeal before CIT(A) where the application for revision u/s 264 rejected by the CIT - Notwithstanding unsuccessful effort of the assessee in the...

Claim of refund - Revision before the Commissioner u/s 264 in favor of assessee, against in intimation u/s 143(1) - the intimation under Section 143(1) is regarded as an...

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Addition in an intimation order u/s 143(1) - AO/CPC jurisdiction to make an adjustment in an Intimation Order u/s. 143(1) - No intimation given to the assessee of such...

Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c),...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - an order/ intimation passed u/s 143(1) passed by the AO is equally an order, which can be questioned and be made subject matter...

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Revision power u/s 264 - CIT committed a manifest error in exercising revisional power when petitioner's appeal was pending before CIT (Appeals) - HC

Quick Updates: