Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for ...

Customs

May 13, 2024

Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden of proof does indeed shift to the person from whose possession the goods were seized under section 123, emphasizing the necessity of proving that the goods were not smuggled. The Tribunal confirmed the confiscation under section 111 was justified based on the evidence presented, including the frequency of travel by the Main Accused and the nature of the goods being consistent with smuggling activities. The evidence from electronic devices and a diary supported the assumption of smuggling.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for ...

Customs

May 13, 2024

You may also like:

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Smuggling - Gold - It is true that the conduct of the appellants was suspicious - But, the Officers did not have a reasonable belief in the first place to assert that...

Smuggled goods - Burden of proof - Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled - AT

Smuggling - Burden of proof - Confiscation of Silver Jewellery, Silver Boondi & Indian Currency - The Tribunal's decision emphasized the lack of evidence and failure to...

Benami transactions - offence under Benami Act - onus of proving a benami transaction - after amendment, the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the...

Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

Smuggling - Confiscation of gold / gold jewellery - burden to prove - on all the jewellery, there are no foreign markings and hence, there is no reasonable basis to...

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Valuation of imported goods - mis-declaration of goods - burden to prove - the burden which was on the respondent was never discharged and hence, there is no question of...

Smuggling (illicit import) or goods of domestic origin - Betel Nuts - Seizure and confiscation of goods - The goods can be used, sold, re-sold etc. without any duty...

Smuggling - recovery of foreign goods from the appellant by way of town seizure - Gold Coins - The whole burden or onus to establish the smuggled nature of goods/gold is...

Burden of proof in case of Smuggling Activity - This discharge of burden of proof, in our opinion, can only happen in cases where there is a reasonable possibility of...

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

Confiscation of goods - Smuggling - foreign origin Betel Nuts - Impugned goods namely betel nuts are not specified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the...

Confiscation of seized goods - The betel nut being non notified goods; burden to prove the fact of smuggling lies on the department and the same has not been discharged;...

Quick Updates: