Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - ...

Case Laws Companies Law

May 16, 2024

Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with the NCLAT’s order dated 16.04.2019, specifically regarding the rectification of the register of members to reflect the shareholding status as of 19.05.2010. The fresh transfer of shares on 28.11.2017 was invalidated, as it was an attempt to circumvent the Tribunal’s previous orders. The appellants were found to have engaged in acts of oppression and mismanagement, justifying the respondents’ claims. The appellants did not properly offer proportionate shares from additional allotments to the respondents, violating the Tribunal’s directives. - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the NCLT’s findings that the appellants engaged in improper share transfers and failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - ...

Case Laws Companies Law

May 16, 2024

You may also like:

Oppression and Mismanagement - illegal allotment of shares - the allegations that there has been an illegal allotment of Petitioner's shares, exclusion of Petitioner...

Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 being a shareholder with 25% shareholding at the time of incorporation and also being one of the...

Oppression and mismanagement - illegal transfer of shares - this Tribunal is exercising its ample powers to waive the requisite shareholding percentage in order to...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to refuse waiver u/ss 244(1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2013 to the Appellants, who held only 5.83% shareholding, to file an...

Oppression and Mismanagement - allotment of shares - continuation as additional (3rd) director after 26.9.2010 is not as per law as was not regularised in AGM - Board...

Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient opportunity to be involved in the affairs/board meetings - allotment of shares at par without premium to...

Oppression and mismanagement - Transfer of shares - Once it is accepted that the Appellant can also challenge the transfer of shareholding as being oppressive and as...

Oppression and mismanagement - Directors were under a responsibility to disclose to all the shareholders that further shares are to be issued and such of them as were...

Mintainability of a company petition u/s 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, focusing on the pre-conditions envisaged under sub-sections (1) and (3). It examines whether the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and Mismanagement - increase in the paid-up capital from Rs.1 crore to Rs.2 crores in the Extraordinary General Body Meeting - Allegation of fraudulent...

Quick Updates: