The High Court considered a case u/s 129 of CGST Act regarding ...

Initiation of proceedings u/s 129 of CGST Act - Penalty imposed for minor discrepancy in Delivery Challan quashed. Gold not meant for sale.

Case Laws GST

June 6, 2024

The High Court considered a case u/s 129 of CGST Act regarding penalty imposition for a minor discrepancy in a Delivery Challan. The issue was whether non-disclosure of Kundan stones justified penalty imposition. The Court found compliance with Rule 55 of CGST Rules except for the mentioned discrepancy. It noted the error in presuming the purpose of transporting gold and held that the goods were for sampling, not sale. The Court quashed the penalty of Rs. 14,50,560 and allowed the petition, directing refund and granting liberty to proceed for the discrepancy.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered a case u/s 129 of CGST Act regarding ...

Initiation of proceedings u/s 129 of CGST Act - Penalty imposed for minor discrepancy in Delivery Challan quashed. Gold not meant for sale.

Case Laws GST

June 6, 2024

You may also like:

Anti-Profiteering - Initiation and conduct of proceedings - Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended

Time Limitation - issuing a notice after the detention - The High Court noted that the actions of the tax authority did not align with the prescribed timeline outlined...

Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It is now well settled that the provisions of the Limitation Act are applicable to proceedings under the IBC as far as may be...

The High Court ruled on a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 129 of the GST Act due to an error in mentioning the vehicle number in the E-way bill during the transit...

Expired e-way bill - Levy of penalty - the discrepancy pointed out is only on the date of invoice which is shown as 03.02.2021 while that shown in the e-way bill was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the appellant's argument regarding being a minor, stating that penalty proceedings initiated against a minor...

Anti Profiteering - Initiation and conduct of proceedings - Initial investigation period extended from 3 months to 6 months - Rule 129 of the Central Goods and Services...

Levy of penalty for discrepancy in E-way Bill - E-way bills generated without completely filling Part B - The object of circular dated 14.09.2018 was that in case of...

Levy of penalty - goods were seized goods for not accompanied by E-way bills - Upon a purposive reading of the sections 129, 130 and 138, it would suffice to state that...

Levy of penalty - Movement of goods wherein e-way bill was cancelled by the purchaser - Since there is no intention to evade GST, no penalty can be imposed - The...

Detention order - challenge on the short ground that the impugned proceedings are barred by the limitation prescribed under Section 129(3) of the GST Act, 2017 - the...

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

The seized vehicle and goods have been released on the strength of such security deposit. Hence, the proceedings taken out u/s 129 are liable to be concluded in view of...

Right to file an appeal - whether a person who opts to make payment in terms of Clause (a) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 129 of the CGST Act / SGST Act to get...

Levy of penalty - vehicle number in Part-B of the e-way bill was incorrect - minor typographical error - Typically when the error is a minor error of the nature found in...

Quick Updates: