The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the ...

Violation of fairness: Petitioner's explanations ignored. Discrepancies unaddressed. Order set aside for review.

Case Laws GST

June 8, 2024

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice was not considered. Discrepancies in GSTR returns were explained by the petitioner, including credit notes and missing supplier invoices. The court noted that the explanation provided was not rejected with reasons, leading to the order being set aside. The case was remanded for reconsideration, and the petition was disposed of by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the ...

Violation of fairness: Petitioner's explanations ignored. Discrepancies unaddressed. Order set aside for review.

Case Laws GST

June 8, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

Power of review - error apparent on the face of record or not - the very initiation of the review proceedings pursuant to Show Cause Notice dated 04.01.2011 was void ab...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Registration u/s 80G(5) - The rejection was based on allegations of discrepancy in the organization's name, violation of FCRA provisions, and involvement in religious...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Review of order - Levy of penalty - grounds for review are that the imposition of penalty by the authorities is not automatic and the same can be imposed only when there...

Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning,...

Jurisdiction - power of Tribunal to review its own order - Power of Review has to be granted by statute and the ‘power of Review’ is not an inherent power and therefore...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Validity of initiation of review proceedings - It is a trite law that an order, which is bad from its inception itself, cannot be cured by subsequent action. In the...

Validity of review order - Period of limitation - It cannot be understood what prevented the Department from submitting before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the...

Discrepancy of stock - The conclusion reached by the Tribunal is coloured by the irrelevant consideration ignoring the relevant documents produced by the appellant...

Short deduction of TDS upto ₹ 100 will be ignored

Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

Quick Updates: