The HC condoned the delay of 98 days in filing the appeal. The ...

High Court excuses 98-day appeal delay due to accountant's error from raid disruptions, prioritizing merits over technicality.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The HC condoned the delay of 98 days in filing the appeal. The appellant's services were disrupted due to a raid, and the accountant entrusted with filing the appeal failed to perform his duty, leading to his termination. The HC found the delay reasonable and allowed the appeal, favoring adjudication on merits over dismissal on technical grounds of limitation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC condoned the delay of 98 days in filing the appeal. The ...

High Court excuses 98-day appeal delay due to accountant's error from raid disruptions, prioritizing merits over technicality.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The public notice issued by the Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, provides special measures to facilitate the liquidation and rectification of errors...

Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record...

Disallowance on account of loss on error trade - due to human error in punching the wrong scrip code, or punching of wrong quantity or in punching buy order in place of...

Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Government of India, is harmonizing Chapters 40 to 98 of Schedule-II (Export Policy) to 8-digit ITC(HS) codes, aligning existing...

Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the replacement of the Resolution Professional (RP) appointed u/s 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The RP had previously...

Refund claim - SAD - importer appointed a new Chartered Accountant, who becomes their regular Chartered Accountant and cannot be considered as a onetime independent...

Application for advance ruling rejected as questions raised were already pending in show cause notice proceedings under CGST/KGST Act. First proviso to Section 98(2)...

Advance ruling application regarding maintainability, levy of GST on network/wheeling charges, cross-subsidy surcharge, additional surcharge, and fees and charges...

Appeal against the question which was not answered by the AAR - The question of taxability having been rejected by the lower Authority albeit incorrectly, without any...

Sale of house property - Denial of the cost of improvement - apart from nonspecification of the work, so that the very basis of the assessee’s claim remains unknown, the...

Exemption u/s 11 was not claimed in original return due to auditor's mistake in Form No. 10B. Assessee rectified mistake by filing revised Form No. 10B. Statutory claim...

Fee payable to CA Firms, for Special Audits directed u/s 142(2A) - CA Firm registered as MSME - Recovery of fees due from the Income Tax Department invoking the...

Misconduct of Chartered Accountant - A Chartered Accountant is a person, who holds an office of confidence and not only his client, but even in Department in which...

Cost accountant v/s Chartered Accountants - nature of work - amendment to Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - auditing of accounts by Cost...

Quick Updates: