Article Section |
|
Home Articles DEVKUMAR KOTHARI Experts This 
|
Submit New Article
|
|
|
Articles By: DEVKUMAR KOTHARI |
Showing 241 to 260 of 1115 Records |
|
|
COVID- LOCKDOWN - BELATED OR IRREGULAR ACCOUNTING - SPECIAL CARE IS NEEDED FOR DATE OF TRANSACTIONS
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
November 23, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Un-necessary litigation initiated by the revenue forcing assessee to protest and contest and delayed justice in the case of NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION {NCDC}.
1 Comment
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
November 11, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
E-proceedings and face less assessment and appeals- officers need to be more attentive, responsible and answerable.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 23, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
HAPHAZARD NOTICE BOARD DIFFICULT TO FIND DATES OF HEARING- need lot of improvement. Some suggestions.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 21, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Provisions like those of sections 43CA, 50C, .50CA,S.56 S.68 etc. - ADDITION SHOULD NOT BE MADE WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF UNDISCLOSED OR EXTRA CONSIDERATION - a point of view.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 15, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
AMENDMENT of S. 50C ALLOWING RELIEF IS CURATIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE MADRAS HC – also speedy justice by Tribunal and High Court.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 14, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
NEW TCS FROM BUYERS OF GOODS W.E.F. 01102020 – request to honourable PM and FM to defer new TCS provisions.
1 Comment
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 22, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Applicant / corporate creditor to pay fees of IRP/ RP – NCALT order holding debtor to pay fees reversed – quality of NCLT/ NCALT teams need improvement.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 16, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Change of name- general aspects and discussion in view of judgment on issue of no transfer and no stamp duty payable on change of name.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 15, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Broader discussion about eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit
1 Comment
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 5, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Companies Act, 2013 Free Reserves and some related issues to find out circumstances in which revaluation gains can be considered as ‘free reserve’ and ‘net worth’.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 3, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
INDEPENDENCE OF IRP OR RP VIS A VIS CORPORATE CREDITOR- SUPREME COURT REVERSE ORDER OF NCALT – views of author find approval- however, author request honorable judges that reasoned and elaborate judgments to avoid further disputes.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 29, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
PURPOSE SEEKING APPROACH APPLIED - SUBSEQUENT PROVISION OF IBC 2016 HELD TO PREVAIL OVER PROVISION OF TEA ACT 1953.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 28, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Independence of IRP/ RP – law specifically provides for independence from Corporate Debtor only and not from Corporate Creditor. NCLAT/ NCLT ask for substitution of IRP / RP - not justified and is not as per law and general practices.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 26, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Rate of depreciation – litigation by revenue is not desirable.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 25, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
‘shall’ versus ‘may’ and ‘may’ versus ‘shall’- lend scope of discretion and litigation.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 24, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
S.40 (a) (ia) r.w.s 194C - SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY (SC) – COUNSELS MISSED TO POINT OUT THAT NO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW WERE FRAMED BY HIGH COURT and did not request for restoration of appeal to High Court- a fit case for review.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 5, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Section 40(a)(ia) applies to all sums ( paid or payable) which are subject to TDS. – views of author find approval in recent ruling of the Supreme Court.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
August 4, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
IN CASE OF ARMS LENGTH TRANSACTIONS -COMMERCIAL EXPEDIENCY AND DECISION OF BUSINESSMAN / ASSESSEE WILL PREVAIL- REVENUE HAS NO BUSINESS TO SECOND GUESS
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
July 29, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
S.260A – ‘substantial question of law’, framed by High Court is essential, otherwise order or judgment is liable to be set aside rules the Supreme Court.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
July 28, 2020
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
|
............ |
|