Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + Commission Central Excise - 2002 (1) TMI Commission This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2002 (1) TMI 413 - Commission - Central Excise

Issues:
Settlement application by M/s. Spin Packaging Ltd. for central excise duty liability and penalties.

Analysis:
- Brief Facts of the Case:
- M/s. Spin Packaging Ltd. engaged in manufacturing HDPE/PP woven fabrics faced a surprise visit by Central Excise officers revealing shortages in stock of final products and inputs.
- Show Cause Notice issued for alleged suppression of production and demanding central excise duty.
- Order-in-Original confirmed duty demand, imposed penalties, and personal penalty on Shri Shashikant B. Jani.

- Settlement Application:
- Applicants filed settlement applications admitting the duty liability demanded, seeking immunity from fines, penalties, and prosecution.
- Commission allowed the applications to proceed, adjusted the amount already paid, and directed payment of the balance.
- Final hearing held, representation by consultants and authorized signatories of M/s. Spin Packaging Ltd.

- Submissions and Arguments:
- Consultant presented the case history, acceptance of duty liability, and payments made before and after the show cause notice.
- Requested immunity under Section 32K of Central Excise Act, waiver of penalties, and interest due to full disclosure and payment.
- Revenue argued against immunity, citing tampering with challans and removal of goods, questioning the penalty waiver.

- Commission's Observations and Decision:
- Commission reviewed submissions, finding full disclosure of duty liability and cooperation by the applicants.
- Granted immunity from prosecution under Central Excise Act and Indian Penal Code for the case.
- Imposed penalties as confirmed by the Additional Commissioner but waived the excess amount.
- Order stated the settlement would be void if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, with instructions to inform all concerned.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates