Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 1988 (7) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1988 (7) TMI 333 - SUPREME COURTWhether the first meeting of the corporation called for that day at 2.45 p.m. by the Municipal Commissioner, respondent No. 9, who presided over the meeting, was adjourned for the day or adjourned sine die and, therefore, had to be called on some subsequent date to be fixed by him and thus necessitated the giving of seven days' clear notice as required by rule 1(h), Chapter II of the Rules framed under section 453 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949? Held that:- Appeal dismissed. On an overall view of the facts and circumstances, no hesitation in upholding the finding that the first meeting of the Municipal Corporation fixed by the Municipal Commissioner for May 6, 1988, was not "adjourned for the day" or "adjourned sine di" but had only been put off to a later hour, i.e., the proceedings had only been suspended, to be re-commenced when peace and order were restored.
|