TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 1998 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

 

1998 (8) TMI 452 - HC - Companies Law

The High Court of Bombay allowed the application under sections 446 and 537 of the Companies Act, 1956, for continuing a suit against Kanakdhara Steel Ltd. in liquidation. The appointment of a receiver was not granted as there was already one appointed. The application was disposed of, subject to the rights of other secured creditors and workmen. (1998 (8) TMI 452 - High Court of Bombay)

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Builder must pay GST on construction inputs despite exempt flat sales ...
H: AI Platform Chanakya Analyzes Handwritten Student Answers with 92% Acc...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 374 redefines High Court jurisdictions for...
H: Central Government Revises Form LEAP-1 Under Companies (Listing of Equ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 373 modernizes appeal limits while maintai...
F: Taxpayer not required to reverse GST on supplier incentives received a...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 372 maintains identical appeal limitation ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 371 allows assessment amendments for membe...
F: Job worker can sell scrap directly from premises with principal's agre...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 370 maintains existing framework for enfor...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 369 requires tax payment despite pending a...
F: GST invoices require manual signatures or proper digital signatures, s...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 532 enables government to create faceless ...
F: GST department challenges input tax credit reversal under section 37 f...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 532 grants unlimited government power to m...
F: Taxpayer must reverse Input Tax Credit claimed after Section 16(4) dea...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 378 allows senior authorities to revise su...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 377 replaces Section 263 maintaining revis...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 368 sets Supreme Court appeal procedures m...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 367 streamlines Supreme Court appeals elim...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 366 requires High Court tax appeals heard ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 365 mirrors existing Section 260A for High...
T: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal structure unchanged in new Bill despite ...
A: Excel printout from pen drive inadmissible as evidence without mandato...
A: Vehicle rental income to Goods Transport Agencies exempt from GST unde...
A: GST collections hit record Rs 22.08 lakh crore in 2024-25 with 9.4% gr...
A: Section 128A closure procedures allow taxpayers to apply for interest/...
A: Company liable for advance tax until amalgamation scheme receives form...
A: Lithium-ion batteries for mobile phones qualify as telephone parts und...
A: Bank wrongly served GST recovery notice under Section 79(1)(c) without...