TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 1999 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

 

1999 (2) TMI 463 - HC - Companies Law

The High Court of Bombay ordered the company to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs within eight weeks. Failure to do so would result in the company petition being admitted. If the amount is deposited, the petition will be dismissed, and the petitioner can file a suit within four weeks.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 387 transitions advance ruling powers from...
T: Board for Advance Rulings can void tax rulings obtained through fraud ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 385 creates jurisdictional bar preventing ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 384 sets advance ruling procedures mirrori...
N: Ministry imposes countervailing duties on copper wire rods from four A...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 383 mirrors existing advance ruling proced...
T: Clause 382 Income Tax Bill 2025 protects advance ruling proceedings fr...
F: Person selling developed plots on own land with 20 crore income exempt...
A: Kerala loses revenue despite high consumption due to flawed IGST settl...
A: GST completes eight years with mixed results transforming exporters an...
A: Appellate authority exceeded jurisdiction by addressing input tax cred...
A: Section 80-IAC offers 100% tax deduction for eligible startups but fac...
A: Company wins challenge against interest and penalty after reversing In...
A: Scrap trader's GST confiscation challenge dismissed as factual dispute...
H: Registration cancellation overturned as suspension prevents tax recove...
H: GST officer's tax determination invalid due to improper show cause not...
H: AAR exempts subsidised canteen charges from GST under Factories Act st...
H: Income tax notices under sections 142, 144, 144B, and 147 upheld despi...
H: Business payments to parent company in normal course don't qualify as ...
H: ITAT allows appeal, deletes interest expenditure disallowance after fi...
H: Trust registration under section 12AB cannot be rejected for minor pro...
H: Assessee wins against double taxation of INR 6.90 crores differential ...
H: PCIT's mechanical approval without proper examination invalidates Sect...
H: Assessee's appeal dismissed for failing to file return and challenge s...
H: ITAT remands unexplained cash deposits case involving toddy sale proce...
H: NCLAT overturns dismissal of Section 7 petition, rules no discretion t...
H: Central excise authority cannot claim secured creditor status under Se...
H: Film exhibitors paying distributors for screening rights not taxable a...
H: CESTAT upholds service tax on upfront fees under Concession Agreements...
F: Company faces tax notice for failing reverse charge mechanism on rent ...