Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2000 (4) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (4) TMI 758 - SC - Indian LawsWhether the arbitrator was competent to entertain the counter-claim filed by the respondent No. 1 for dissolution of the firm V.H. Patel & Company? Held that:- Appeal dismissed. So far as the power of the arbitrator to dissolve the partnership is concerned, the law is clear that where there is a clause in the articles of partnership or agreement or order referring all the matters in difference between the partners to arbitration, arbitrator has power to decide whether or not the partnership shall be dissolved and to award its dissolution. Power of the arbitrator will primarily depend upon the arbitration clause and the reference made by the court to it. If under the terms of the reference all disputes and different arising between the parties have been referred to arbitration, the arbitrator will, in general, be able to deal with all matters, including dissolution. There is no principle of law or any provision which bars an arbitrator to examine such a question. Although the learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a passage of Pollock & Mulla quoted earlier, that passage is only confined to the inherent powers of the court as to whether dissolution of partnership is just and equitable, but we have demonstrated in the course of our order that it is permissible for the court to refer to arbitration a dispute in relation to dissolution as well on grounds such as destruction of mutual trust and confidence between the partners which is the foundation therefor.
|