Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued soon

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password

 

2002 (2) TMI 1083 - AT - Central Excise

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal filed by M/s. S.S. Jain & Company due to a 23-day delay in filing, which was explained as a mistake by the applicant's assistant. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision. (2002 (2) TMI 1083 - CEGAT, Mumbai)

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 466 introduces thousand rupee penalties bu...
F: Taxpayer faces 100% penalty under Section 122 despite voluntary tax pa...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 465 mirrors existing penalty structure but...
C: Import policy amended for gold alloys exceeding 1% weight now includes...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 464 imposes penalties up to Rs 1 lakh on t...
F: Suppliers' post-supply discounts without predetermined agreements don'...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 463 imposes Rs 10,000 penalty on professio...
H: New CSR-1 Form Required for Compliance Reporting Under Section 135 fro...
F: Builder with partial occupation certificate for 23 floors faces GST co...
F: Doctor's GST turnover calculation includes hospital services, FD inter...
F: Cake gels for bakery industries classified under HSN 2106 as food prep...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 462 imposes one lakh rupee penalty for ina...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 461 sets penalties Rs 10,000-1,00,000 for ...
T: Non-resident entity with liaison office faces identical penalty struct...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 459 sets daily penalties up to INR 500,000...
N: Central Government notifies IREDA redeemable bonds as Long-Term Specif...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 458 sets 2% penalty for non-disclosure of ...
A: India's GST system struggles with compliance paradox as enforcement pr...
A: EOUs must pay customs duty, cess, and IGST on unutilized materials whe...
A: Section 18 GST Act allows input tax credit during registration transit...
A: Shipping bill SB0006 error blocks IGST refund due to data mismatches b...
A: Tax authorities cannot deny refunds by disregarding binding judicial p...
A: Tax demand order exceeding show-cause notice amount violates Section 7...
H: Petition Allowed for Revised TRAN-1 Form Under Section 140 CGST Act; M...
H: Cancellation of registration without proper SCN service violates natur...
H: Section 263 IT Act: Court Upholds Revision but Orders AO to Provide Re...
H: ITAT Allows Deduction of Software Expenses, Excludes Personal Gifts Un...
H: ITAT Upholds Bank's Amortization, Depreciation, and Deductions Under S...
H: ITAT Confirms Depreciation on Leasehold Improvements, Upholds Rs. 4 Cr...
H: Reopening Notice Valid if Issued Within Six Years Under Section 148; A...