Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2000 (8) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (8) TMI 964 - SC - Companies LawWhether sponsoring authority was right in placing the confessional statements of the said two co-accused, which were documents in their detention proceedings and, if placed, whether non placing of the retraction made by the said two accused which inherently co-relates the confessional statement, before the detaining authority, affects the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority? Held that:- The impugned detention order dated 23-12-1999, suffers from patent illegality and, thus, cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the same is quashed and petitioner is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith unless wanted in connection with some other case Coming back to the present case we find really it is a case of one composite ground. The different numbers of the ground of detention are only paragraphs narrating the facts with the details of the document which is being relied but factually, the detention order is based on one ground, which is revealed by ground 1(xvi) of the ground of detention which we have already quoted hereinbefore. Thus, on the facts of this case section 5A has no application in the present case.
|