Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2002 (10) TMI 471 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of Tel Rahat Rooh under Central Excise Tariff Act - Sub-heading 3003.30 or 3305.10.

Analysis:
1. The appeal filed by Revenue raised the issue of whether Tel Rahat Rooh manufactured by M/s. Harbans Ram Bhagwan Das Ayurvedic Sansthan (P) Ltd. should be classified under sub-heading 3003.30 as claimed by the Respondents or under sub-heading 3305.10 as claimed by the Revenue.

2. The Respondents did not appear for the hearing, and the Asst. Commissioner initially classified the product under sub-heading 3305.10, but the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal of the Respondents based on the herbal and ayurvedic nature of the ingredients, the manufacturing process, and the product being under a Drug license. The Revenue argued that the product's daily use, lack of medical prescription, and the nature of ingredients should classify it under sub-heading 3305.10.

3. The Tribunal considered the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Ltd., emphasizing that medicines are usually prescribed by medical practitioners for a limited time. The Tribunal noted the absence of evidence that Tel Rahat Rooh was used on medical advice or cured specific diseases mentioned on the label. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal held that mere claims on the label do not make a product an Ayurvedic medicament, and the product should be classified under Heading 33.05 of the Central Excise Tariff.

4. Based on the established legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and classified Tel Rahat Rooh under Heading 33.05. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of medical prescription and disease treatment for classification as an Ayurvedic medicament. The Cross Objection was also disposed of due to the lack of additional arguments.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the classification of Tel Rahat Rooh under the Central Excise Tariff Act, highlighting the importance of medical prescription and disease treatment evidence for products claiming to be Ayurvedic medicaments.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates