Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2003 (7) TMI 337 - AT - Central Excise
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, Castrol India Ltd., regarding the determination of assessable value of lubricating oil. The Tribunal found that the officer at Mumbai did not have jurisdiction over the duty liability for activities carried out at Ballabhgarh, where Castrol India Ltd. repacked the lubricants. The Tribunal also noted that the factories at Wadala and Ballabhgarh were not related persons as they belonged to the same entity. Therefore, the demand for duty was deemed to have no basis, and the impugned order was set aside.
|