Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (9) TMI 750 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......e absence of any documentary evidence to show that goods were returned for being remade, refined, reconditioned or subject to any other similar process in the factory, there is no compliance of the provision as contained in Rule 173L. I, therefore, allow the appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objections filed by the respondent are dismissed.
|