Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (6) TMI 356 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......artment cannot be heard to contend that the first appellant has suppressed the fact of second appellant being its holding company. Since we are inclined to allow the appeals on the ground of limitation, we do not propose to go into the other contentions raised in this appeal. 8. emsp We therefore, set aside the impugned order and allow the appeals.
|