Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (7) TMI 556 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......it under Rule 57Q therefore was not permissible. The goods could be inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, and would have been entitled to credit under Rule 57A but for the fact that no duty was paid on the electric overhead crane, in the manufacture of which they were used. 3. emsp The appeal is therefore dismissed.
|