Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (11) TMI 442 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......dering their claim under Rule 173H was ever filed. Therefore, for the first time at this stage, they cannot be permitted to urge for the consideration of their claim under the said Rule. 3. emsp In view of the discussion made above, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order and the same is upheld. The appeal of the appellants is dismissed.
|