Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2004 (4) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (4) TMI 323 - SUPREME COURTWhether the order dated August 23, 1989, was in respect of the sale, use or supply of goods or for the provision of services? Held that:- Appeal allowed. The finding of the Commission that the practice forbidden by the earlier order dated August 23, 1989, also covered the housing scheme as advertised by the appellant is erroneous for the additional reason that ‘service’ in connection with real estate was brought within the parameters of the Act only by an amendment of the definition of services in section 2(r) with effect from September 27, 1991. Therefore the order dated August 23, 1989, could not have related to advertisements pertaining to real estate. Besides the advertisement in question was made much prior to the amendment. Therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the order of the Commission without any order as to costs.
|