Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2004 (1) TMI 486 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Duty demand and penalty imposition on M/s. S.C. Brothers for clandestinely cleared scrap during 1996-99.

Analysis:
The case involved the confirmation of duty demand and imposition of penalties on M/s. S.C. Brothers, manufacturers of industrial machinery, for the clandestine clearance of scrap during the period 1996-97, 1997-98, and 1998-99. Central Excise officers visited the unit, conducted investigations, and found discrepancies in the maintenance of challans for finished goods and scrap clearance. The security gate passes did not specify the quantity of scrap cleared, leading to the department estimating the minimum quantity based on the statement of the storekeeper, Mr. Desai. The storekeeper confirmed that the security gate passes were prepared by him for materials other than finished goods, with quantities ranging from 2.5 to 3 tonnes. The Joint Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty demand and penalties. The Tribunal, after reviewing the evidence, found sufficient support for the charge of clandestine removal of scrap and upheld the decision, rejecting the appeals.

This judgment highlights the importance of accurate record-keeping and compliance in the manufacturing sector to prevent clandestine activities. The case underscores the significance of maintaining proper documentation, such as challans and gate passes, to ensure transparency in business operations and avoid disputes with regulatory authorities. The reliance on statements from employees, like the storekeeper, to estimate quantities in the absence of clear records emphasizes the need for businesses to have robust internal controls and procedures to prevent potential violations and penalties. The decision reaffirms the authority of the Tribunal to uphold duty demands and penalties when supported by sufficient evidence, emphasizing the accountability of businesses in adhering to excise regulations and fulfilling their obligations to the government.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates