Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2003 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (1) TMI 17 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTBenefit of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 – pendency of appeal - interpretation of section 95(i) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 - although at best the appeal of the appellant can be said to be pending, the same was not admitted and the words used in section 95(i)(c) of the Scheme of 1998 were utmost important which had used the words that the provisions of the Scheme of 1998 would not apply to a case where no appeal or reference or writ petition is admitted and pending before any appellate authority. The word "admitted" is of utmost importance. The same cannot be ignored or given a go-by. The appellant has failed to prove it to our satisfaction that at any point of time, its appeal stood admitted also. – Hence when the appeal is pending but not admitted, benefit cannot be granted under the Scheme
|