Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2004 (4) TMI 401 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Challenge to imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act.

Analysis:
The case involved the challenge to the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 1,71,077 on the appellants for crossing the limit of clearance provided under the Small Scale Exemption Notification. The appellants, engaged in the manufacture of Latex Foam products, voluntarily informed the Revenue Department about the excess clearance and deposited Rs. 3,52,285. Subsequently, the Revenue issued a show cause notice demanding Rs. 4,51,185 for the goods cleared over and above the exemption limit. The appellants accepted the demand and paid the entire duty amount.

The appellants argued that their voluntary deposit of Rs. 3,52,285 demonstrated no intention to evade duty, especially since the show cause notice was issued almost a year after they informed the Department and paid the duty. On the other hand, the Revenue contended that the total duty payable was Rs. 4,51,185, and the appellants had not deposited the entire amount.

The Tribunal analyzed the facts and found that the appellants had indeed deposited Rs. 3,52,285 on their own initiative, which was not disputed by the Revenue. The show cause notice was issued only after the appellants informed the Department and paid the duty. Considering these circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that there was no mens rea on the part of the appellants to evade duty. Therefore, the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was deemed unsustainable and was set aside. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates