Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (2) TMI 529 - CESTAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......ssioner (Appropriation), wherein, he has clearly noted that there was no allegation of suppression in the matter. Therefore, the contention raised by the ld. Counsel is required to be accepted in terms of the Board rsquo s Circular. There is no infirmity in the order. The order appealed is legal and proper and hence, the Revenue appeal is rejected.
|