TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

 

2004 (2) TMI 539 - AT - Central Excise

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the decision regarding the excisability of "Borkut" with added preservatives. The Commissioner's decision classifying "Borkut" under CSH 2001.10 CETA, 1985 was affirmed, leading to the dismissal of all 3 appeals filed by the appellants.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
T: Infrastructure debt fund TDS rate stays 5% for non-residents under new...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 393 maintains 10% TDS on land compensation...
F: Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance applies to short TDS deduction cases pe...
F: Composition dealers cannot use margin scheme for used vehicles under N...
N: Ministry of Finance imposes anti-dumping duty on Linear Alkyl Benzene ...
H: Oman introduces 5% personal income tax on high earners above $109,000 ...
A: Charitable trusts and NGOs must complete 12A registration via Form 10A...
A: WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures regulates gover...
A: Company's tax return filed 2 seconds late due to technical glitch acce...
A: GST registration cancellation set aside due to lack of physical notice...
A: Section 16(4) time limits apply to Input Tax Credit on imported goods ...
A: High Court judgments establish key protections against GST recovery du...
A: GST authorities must issue Form MOV-09 penalty orders even when taxpay...
H: Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) quashed for bona fide deduction claim ...
H: DTAA rates override section 206AA when more beneficial to assessee for...
H: HC grants condonation of delay for Form 67 filing under Section 119(2)...
H: Assessee wins exemption under section 10(25)(ii) despite incorrect ITR...
H: Revenue fails to prove foreign company's permanent establishment in In...
H: Cooperative society cannot claim section 80P(2)(d) deduction on intere...
H: Borrowed funds invested temporarily in mutual funds during land purcha...
H: ITAT quashes charitable society's 12A registration cancellation citing...
H: Petitioners win refund of Special Additional Duty under Section 3(5) p...
H: Preference shareholders lack locus standi to challenge Section 55(3) p...
H: Asset purchaser in liquidation not liable for previous owner's electri...
H: Managing Director and Signatory escape cheque bounce case due to insuf...
H: CJM has authority to extend Writ of Commission beyond 90 days under Se...
H: Ex-gratia payment from employer qualifies for relief under section 89(...
F: Taxpayers with turnover below Rs 2 crore get GSTR-9 late fee waiver fo...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 393 replaces Section 194K maintaining 10% ...
F: Company receives GST audit findings in Form ADT-02, faces potential ti...