Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (11) TMI 498 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: ....... rdquo . The said Yash Pal Arora has only signed the Memorandum of Appeal on behalf of the Appellants firm and he should have clearly mentioned in the grounds of Appeal, that he was not present during the verification which he has not done. In view of this, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned Order. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected.
|