Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2003 (9) TMI 42 - HC - Income TaxThe only question for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the undisclosed income of a particular block period if not taxable would be treated as an undisclosed income on non-filing of the return - It is an admitted position that with effect from July 1 1995 the amendment has been made in section 158BC of the Finance Act which clearly provides that if the income of the particular assessment year falling within the block period is not taxable the same shall not be treated to be undisclosed income. Thus question is answered in negative Revenue appeal dismissed
The High Court of Patna considered whether undisclosed income of a block period would be treated as such if not taxable. The court noted an amendment to the Finance Act stating that non-taxable income within a block period should not be treated as undisclosed. The court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal. (Case citation: 2003 (9) TMI 42 - PATNA High Court)
|