Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2002 (9) TMI 18 - HC - Income TaxGift Tax Act 1958 - Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that no element of gift was involved when the assessee retired from the firm in which he was a partner? - In view of our judgment in CGT v. P.K. Somarajan Pillai the question specified above has to be answered in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. We answer the question accordingly.
The High Court of Kerala ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving retirement from a partnership firm, stating that no element of gift was involved. The decision was based on previous court rulings and affirmed by the Supreme Court. The judgment was delivered by Judges G. Sivarajan and C. N. Ramachandran Nair.
|