Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2004 (8) TMI 610 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Valuation of goods for central excise duty purposes in job work scenario. Analysis: The case involved the respondents engaged in job work for converting raw material supplied by Steel Authority of India Limited into finished goods. The issue revolved around the valuation of these goods for central excise duty purposes. The Department contended that the prices claimed by the respondents were incorrect as they were job workers selling goods directly to consumers after paying duty, and no comparable goods were sold by SAIL at the factory gate. The Department issued show cause notices amounting to Rs. 35,91,315, which were adjudicated by the Assistant Commissioner resulting in a demand of Rs. 10,48,026 and a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside this order, leading to the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal, in a previous similar case, held that job workers are liable to pay central excise duty and that the assessable value of processed goods should include the value of raw material, conversion cost, and job worker's profit, not the merchant's profit. The Tribunal found that the assessable value adopted by the job workers was not undervalued, and there was no short levy of duty. The demands made by the Department were deemed unsustainable due to a misunderstanding of valuation principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The only ground raised in the appeal was the Department's Reference Application to the Punjab and Haryana High Court against the Tribunal's order. Since the issue was covered by a previous decision that had not been stayed or overruled, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order and rejected the appeal. The decision was announced on 13-8-2004.
|