Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2005 (6) TMI 442 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Seeking waiver of pre-deposit and penalty for not affixing 'HMT' label on watch parts and carrying out assembly activity under HMT's supervision.

Analysis:
The appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit and penalty totaling Rs. 3,97,837/- and Rs. 4,02,837/- respectively, contending they did not affix the 'HMT' label on watch parts supplied to HMT Ltd. They argued that the assembly activity conducted under HMT's supervision is separate and not subject to duty, challenging the proceedings alleging affixing the 'HMT' monogram. The Tribunal, after hearing both sides, agreed with the appellant's contention that they did not affix the 'HMT' brand name on the parts. The assembly activity was deemed independent, conducted in various locations, with no 'HMT' branding at the appellant's premises, leading to a prima facie case in favor of the appellant.

The Tribunal allowed the stay application unconditionally, granting waiver of pre-deposit and staying the recovery of amounts in full accordance with Section 35F of the Act. The matter was directed to be disposed of within six months, with a hearing scheduled for September 16th, 2005. The decision was pronounced and dictated in open court by the Member (J), providing relief to the appellant based on the prima facie case established regarding the absence of 'HMT' branding on the watch parts and the distinct nature of the assembly activity conducted under HMT's supervision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates