Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (7) TMI 511 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......hich is required to be filed. The declaration under Rule 173B would be sufficient compliance of intent to opt for the benefit of the notification. We find no reasons to disturb the CCE (A)s order in the facts of this case, following a catena of decision on this notification itself. 3. emsp Consequently the appeal is rejected. (Pronounced in Court.)
|