Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2006 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2006 (3) TMI 454 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Denial of Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption notification for exceeding clearances.
2. Claim of eligibility for SSI exemption based on goods manufactured by another entity.
3. Settlement under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and its impact on SSI exemption eligibility.

Analysis:
1. The appellant appealed against the denial of SSI exemption due to clearances exceeding Rs. 3 crores in the previous financial year. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the denial, leading to the current appeal.

2. The appellant argued that in the preceding year, goods were manufactured by another entity on their behalf, and hence, should not be considered in their clearances. However, it was revealed that a Show-cause Notice was issued demanding duty from the appellant as the real manufacturer, not the other entity. The appellant settled the dispute under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme by depositing 50% of the demand, acknowledging the goods were manufactured on their behalf in the relevant year.

3. The Tribunal noted the appellant's admission of the Show-cause Notice and subsequent settlement under the KVS Scheme. As the appellant was treated as the manufacturer for the goods produced on their behalf in the previous year, the denial of SSI exemption for the subsequent year was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal found no fault in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, affirming the denial of SSI exemption due to exceeding clearances in the relevant period.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates