Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2003 (4) TMI 84 - HC - Income TaxSearch and seizure - (i) Whether Tribunal was justified in deleting the on account of business income of the assessee by holding that there was no partnership firm in existence during that year especially in view of the seized books of account which clearly reveal that the assessee was continuously doing pawning business outside its books of account right from the year 1981 to the date of search? - (ii) Whether Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made on account of undisclosed investment made by the assessee in the pawning business? - (iii) Whether Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made on account of interest earned by the assessee from pawning business for the assessment years 1986-87 to 1996-97 by holding that no addition was called for because there was no material on record to justify the action of the Assessing Officer? - There is no any infirmity in the appreciation of evidence made by the Tribunal or the reasons assigned by it for deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer. Therefore none of the questions of which determination has been sought by the Revenue can be treated as a substantial question of law.
|